Yasser Khan (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States)Matthew Louis. Mauriello (University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States)Parsa Nowruzi (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States)Akshara Motani (Stanford University , Stanford, Palo Alto , California, United States)Grace Hon (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Nicholas Vitale (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Jinxing Li (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Jayoung Kim (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Amir Foudeh (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Dalton Duvio (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Erika Shols (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Megan Chesnut (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)James A.. Landay (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Jan Liphardt (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Leanne Williams (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Keith D. Sudheimer (Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States)Boris Murmann (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Zhenan Bao (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States)Pablo E. Paredes Castro (Toyota Research Institute, Los Altos, California, United States)
With advances in electronic-skin and wearable technologies, it is possible to continuously measure stress markers from the skin and sweat to monitor and improve wellbeing and health. Understandably, the sensor's engineering and resolution are important towards its function. However, we find that people looking for an e-skin stress sensor may look beyond measurement precision, demanding a private and stealth design to reduce, for example, social stigmatization. We introduce the idea of a stress sensing "wear index," created from the combination of human-centered design (n=24), physiological (n=10), and biochemical (n=16) data. This wear index can inform the design of stress wearables to fit specific applications, e.g., human factors may be relevant for a wellbeing application, versus a relapse prevention application that may require more sensing precision. Our wear index idea can be further generalized as a method to close gaps between design and engineering practices.