Writing, Sketching and AI

会議の名前
CHI 2024
Neural Canvas: Supporting Scenic Design Prototyping by Integrating 3D Sketching and Generative AI
要旨

We propose Neural Canvas, a lightweight 3D platform that integrates sketching and a collection of generative AI models to facilitate scenic design prototyping. Compared with traditional 3D tools, sketching in a 3D environment helps designers quickly express spatial ideas, but it does not facilitate the rapid prototyping of scene appearance or atmosphere. Neural Canvas integrates generative AI models into a 3D sketching interface and incorporates four types of projection operations to facilitate 2D-to-3D content creation. Our user study shows that Neural Canvas is an effective creativity support tool, enabling users to rapidly explore visual ideas and iterate 3D scenic designs. It also expedites the creative process for both novices and artists who wish to leverage generative AI technology, resulting in attractive and detailed 3D designs created more efficiently than using traditional modeling tools or individual generative AI platforms.

著者
Yulin Shen
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
Yifei Shen
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Jiawen Cheng
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
Chutian Jiang
Computational Media and Arts Thrust, Guangzhou, China
Mingming Fan
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
Zeyu Wang
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
論文URL

doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642096

動画
A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants
要旨

In our era of rapid technological advancement, the research landscape for writing assistants has become increasingly fragmented across various research communities. We seek to address this challenge by proposing a design space as a structured way to examine and explore the multidimensional space of intelligent and interactive writing assistants. Through community collaboration, we explore five aspects of writing assistants: task, user, technology, interaction, and ecosystem. Within each aspect, we define dimensions and codes by systematically reviewing 115 papers while leveraging the expertise of researchers in various disciplines. Our design space aims to offer researchers and designers a practical tool to navigate, comprehend, and compare the various possibilities of writing assistants, and aid in the design of new writing assistants.

著者
Mina Lee
Microsoft Research, New York, New York, United States
Katy Ilonka. Gero
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
John Joon Young. Chung
Midjourney, San Francisco, California, United States
Simon Buckingham Shum
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Vipul Raheja
Grammarly, New York, New York, United States
Hua Shen
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Subhashini Venugopalan
Google, Mountain View, California, United States
Thiemo Wambsganss
Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
David Zhou
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States
Emad A.. Alghamdi
King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Tal August
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
Avinash Bhat
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Madiha Zahrah Choksi
Cornell Tech, New York, New York, United States
Senjuti Dutta
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Jin L.C. Guo
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Md Naimul Hoque
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States
Yewon Kim
KAIST, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
Simon Knight
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Seyed Parsa Neshaei
EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Antonette Shibani
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Disha Shrivastava
Google DeepMind, London, United Kingdom
Lila Shroff
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Agnia Sergeyuk
JetBrains Research, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
Jessi Stark
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sarah Sterman
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States
Sitong Wang
Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Antoine Bosselut
EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Daniel Buschek
University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Joseph Chee Chang
Allen Institute for AI, Seattle, Washington, United States
Sherol Chen
Google, Mountain View, California, United States
Max Kreminski
Midjourney, San Francisco, California, United States
Joonsuk Park
University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States
Roy Pea
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Eugenia H. Rho
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States
Zejiang Shen
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Pao Siangliulue
B12, New York, New York, United States
論文URL

doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642697

動画
The Impact of Sketch-guided vs. Prompt-guided 3D Generative AIs on the Design Exploration Process
要旨

Various modalities have emerged in the field of 3D generative AI (GenAI) to enhance design outcomes. While some designers find inspiration in prompts to guide their design options, others prefer sketching to embody creative visions. Nonetheless, the impact of the different modalities of 3D GenAI on the design process remains largely unexplored. This study examines the utilization of prompt- and sketch-guided modalities within the design process by conducting linkography and workflow analyses with 12 designers. The results revealed that prompts played a pivotal role in stimulating initial ideation, whereas sketches played a crucial role in embodying design ideas. This investigation highlights the distinct contributions of these modalities at different phases of the design process, suggesting the potential for a more refined and synergistic collaboration between humans and AI. By elucidating the diverse functions of sketches and prompts, we propose prospective directions for the UX framework of the 3D GenAI.

著者
Seung Won Lee
Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Tae Hee Jo
Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Semin Jin
Interior Architecture Design, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Jiin Choi
Interior Architecture Design, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Kyungwon Yun
RECON Labs Inc., Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Sergio Bromberg
Recon Labs, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Seonghoon Ban
RECON Labs Inc., Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Kyung Hoon Hyun
Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
論文URL

doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642218

動画
CreativeConnect: Supporting Reference Recombination for Graphic Design Ideation with Generative AI
要旨

Graphic designers often get inspiration through the recombination of references. Our formative study (N=6) reveals that graphic designers focus on conceptual keywords during this process, and want support for discovering the keywords, expanding them, and exploring diverse recombination options of them, while still having room for designers' creativity. We propose CreativeConnect, a system with generative AI pipelines that helps users discover useful elements from the reference image using keywords, recommends relevant keywords, generates diverse recombination options with user-selected keywords, and shows recombinations as sketches with text descriptions. Our user study (N=16) showed that CreativeConnect helped users discover keywords from the reference and generate multiple ideas based on them, ultimately helping users produce more design ideas with higher self-reported creativity compared to the baseline system without generative pipelines. While CreativeConnect was shown effective in ideation, we discussed how CreativeConnect can be extended to support other types of tasks in creativity support.

著者
DaEun Choi
KAIST, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
Sumin Hong
Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Jeongeon Park
KAIST, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
John Joon Young. Chung
SpaceCraft Inc., Los Angeles, California, United States
Juho Kim
KAIST, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
論文URL

doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642794

動画