Stochastic Machine Witnesses at Work: Today's Critiques of Taylorism are Inadequate for Workplace Surveillance Epistemologies of the Future

要旨

I argue that epistemologies of workplace surveillance are shifting in fundamental ways, and so critiques must shift accordingly. I begin the paper by relating Scientific Management to Human-Centred Computing's ways of knowing through a study of 'metaverse' virtual reality workplaces. From this, I develop two observations. The first is that today's workplace measurement science does not resemble the science that Taylor developed for Scientific Management. Contemporary workplace science is more passive, more intermediated and less controlled. The second observation is that new forms of workplace measurement challenge the norms of empirical science. Instead of having credentialed human witnesses observe phenomena and agree facts about them, we instead make outsourced, uncredentialed stochastic machine witnesses responsible for producing facts about work. With these observations in mind, I assert that critiques of workplace surveillance still framed by Taylorism will not be fit for interrogating workplace surveillance practices of the future.

著者
Sandy J. J.. Gould
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
論文URL

doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642206

動画

会議: CHI 2024

The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (https://chi2024.acm.org/)

セッション: Remote Presentations: Highlight on Security and Privacy

Remote Sessions
7 件の発表
2024-05-14 18:00:00
2024-05-15 02:20:00