AI co-writing systems challenge long held ideals about agency and ownership in the creative process, thereby hindering widespread adoption. To address this, we investigate conceptions of agency and ownership in AI creative co-writing. Drawing on insights from a review of commercial systems, we developed three co-writing systems with similar functionality but differing interface metaphors: agentic, tool-like, and magical. Through interviews with creative writers (n=18), we explored the role of these metaphors in participants’ sense of control and authorship. Our analysis resulted in a taxonomy of agency and ownership subtypes and underscored how metaphorical framings afforded participants different conceptions of agency and ownership. We conclude with recommendations for the design of AI co-writing systems, emphasizing the role of metaphors in participants’ creative practice
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems