As modern tabletop play becomes more hybrid through the integration of digital tools, hybrid digital boardgames (HDBs) – games which mix physical and digital components – can be seen as ''gimmicky''. Previous work has explored the use of technology in hybrid play settings, but relatively little work exists on what makes hybridity meaningful in HDBs. In this paper, we present a model for understanding how meaningful hybridity is constructed through the relationship between the technology, game, and player. Over twelve months, we convened a monthly Critical Play Reference Group of 21 local players to play and discuss a curated selection of HDBs. We analysed 37 semi-structured group interviews for qualities of meaningful hybridity across 25 unique published HDBs. This model identifies what players assess in their HDB experience and how that maps to their overall perception of hybridity, informing the design and evaluation of meaningful hybrid game experiences.
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems