Showing Flow: Comparing Usability of Chord and Sankey Diagrams

要旨

Chord and Sankey diagrams are two common techniques for visualizing flows. Chord diagrams use a radial layout with a single circular axis, and Sankey diagrams use a left-to-right layout with two vertical axes. Previous work suggests both strengths and weaknesses of the radial approach, but little is known about the usability and interpretability of these two layout styles for showing flow. We carried out a study where participants answered questions using equivalent Chord and Sankey diagrams. We measured completion time, errors, perceived effort, and preference. Our results show that participants took substantially longer to answer questions with Chord diagrams and made more errors; participants also rated Chord as requiring more effort, and strongly preferred Sankey diagrams. Our study identifies and explains limitations of the popular Chord layout, provides new understanding about radial vs. linear layouts that can help guide visualization designers, and identifies possible design improvements for both visualization types.

著者
Carl Gutwin
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Aristides F. Mairena
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Venkat Bandi
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
論文URL

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581119

動画

会議: CHI 2023

The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (https://chi2023.acm.org/)

セッション: Visualization Perception

Hall F
6 件の発表
2023-04-24 23:30:00
2023-04-25 00:55:00