Public Opinions About Copyright for AI-Generated Art: The Role of Egocentricity, Competition, and Experience

要旨

Breakthroughs in generative AI (GenAI) have fueled debates concerning the artistic and legal status of AI-generated creations. We investigate laypeople's perceptions (N=432) of AI-generated art through the lens of copyright law. We study lay judgments of GenAI images concerning several copyright-related factors and capture people's opinions of who should be the authors and rights-holders of AI-generated images. To do so, we held an incentivized AI art competition in which some participants used a GenAI model to create art while others evaluated these images. We find that participants believe creativity and effort, but not skills, are needed to create AI-generated art. Participants were most likely to attribute authorship and copyright to the AI model's users and to the artists whose creations were used for training. We find evidence of egocentric effects: participants favored their own art with respect to quality, creativity, and effort---particularly when these assessments determined real monetary awards.

著者
Gabriel Lima
MPI-SP, Bochum, Germany
Nina Grgić-Hlača
Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, Saarbrücken, Germany
Elissa M.. Redmiles
Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
DOI

10.1145/3706598.3713338

論文URL

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713338

動画

会議: CHI 2025

The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (https://chi2025.acm.org/)

セッション: Using AI or Not

G314+G315
7 件の発表
2025-04-29 01:20:00
2025-04-29 02:50:00
日本語まとめ
読み込み中…