Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive Summary

要旨

While peer review enhances writing and research quality, harsh feedback can frustrate and demotivate authors. Hence, it is essential to explore how critiques should be delivered to motivate authors and enable them to keep iterating their work. In this study, we explored the impact of appending an automatically generated positive summary to the peer reviews of a writing task, alongside varying levels of overall evaluations (high vs. low), on authors’ feedback reception, revision outcomes, and motivation to revise. Through a 2x2 online experiment with 137 participants, we found that adding an AI-reframed positive summary to otherwise harsh feedback increased authors’ critique acceptance, whereas low overall evaluations of their work led to increased revision efforts. We discuss the implications of using AI in peer feedback, focusing on how AI-driven critiques can influence critique acceptance and support research communities in fostering productive and friendly peer feedback practices.

著者
Chi-Lan Yang
The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Alarith Uhde
The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Naomi Yamashita
NTT, Keihanna, Japan
Hideaki Kuzuoka
The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
DOI

10.1145/3706598.3713219

論文URL

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713219

動画

会議: CHI 2025

The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (https://chi2025.acm.org/)

セッション: Communication and Socialization

G401
6 件の発表
2025-04-29 01:20:00
2025-04-29 02:50:00
日本語まとめ
読み込み中…